DEWALT Logo
| Home | Membership Login | Find a retailer | Register Products |
 
 Products     Cordless     Woodworking     Miter Saws     Gear/Storage     Racing/Events     Services/Support   
Cordless:   Home Page New Products Systems Chart Articles Batteries & Chargers Power Rating Testimonials
Search
Advanced Search All Products at a Glance
November 21, 2009
Email to a friend Email to a friend Print this page  Printer-friendly version
Cordless
Part 4, Cordless Reciprocating Saws

By Ronald E. Moore, Firehouse.com

Subject: Cordless Reciprocating Saws, Part 4
Topic: Endurance Testing of 18-Volt Cordless Reciprocating Saws
Objective: Conduct endurance tests of 18-volt cordless reciprocating saws to determine work that can be anticipated at fire/rescue incidents
Task: Measure the capability of reciprocating saw batteries and saw blades to perform typical vehicle rescue tasks

It seems no one really knows what the endurance capability of an 18-volt reciprocating saw is when used by firefighters. It therefore set out to determine just how many cuts can be made with an 18-volt saw and one battery.

To accomplish my mission, I designed a series of endurance tests to determine the work output of two different 18-volt batteries from DEWALT and one type from Milwaukee under various rescue situations. The endurance tests began in November 1998 and have progress continually since then. Each test simulates a real-world situation or condition that firefighters may encounter with a reciprocating saw.

The No-Load Test

A cross section view of a typical A-pillar. A single 18-volt battery-powered saw can cut through it in 12 to 20 cuts.
A Power Hawk 12-volt power unit operated the 18-volt Milwaukee reciprocating saw in excess of 21 minutes.

To determine the maximum run time of an 18-volt battery, I secured the trigger of an 18-volt Milwaukee and a DEWALT reciprocating saw in the "on" position. I then snapped on a fully charged 18-volt battery, letting the saw run unloaded. I recorded the running time of the saw until the 18-volt battery discharged and the saw action stopped. This elapsed time was my baseline run time. All other tests, in which the saw had to operate under a load and actually cut material, were compared to this maximum no-load run time.

Milwaukee 18-volt batteries powered its saw from 11 minutes, 50 seconds to over 15 minutes. Milwaukee average no-load time was 13 minutes, 24 seconds. DEWALT's original XR2 batteries powered its saw almost twice as long, a remarkable 23 minutes on average. In 1999, DEWALT introduced a 2.4 amp hour NiCad battery called the XR+. This battery, advertised a having 40% more power than its original Xr2 battery, represents the maximum capacity available in NiCad battery technology today. In no-load tests with the new XR+ battery, the DEWALT saw increased its run time from 23 to 30 minutes.

The "Aged 60 Days" Battery Test

Both DEWALT and Milwaukee claim that their batteries experience a 5% loss of energy per day when not on a charger. To determine how battery deterioration could impact fire service users, I designed an "aged 60 days" battery test. Three Milwaukee batteries were fully charged, then left to sit alone on a shelf at normal room temperature for more than 60 days. After this aging period, I repeated the no-load test with these batteries.

Whereas a fully charged Milwaukee battery ran in excess of 13 minutes. The two-month old batteries averaged a loss of almost 40%, a significant loss of energy. This reinforces the recommendation that all cordless tool batteries be left on a charger at all times to maintain their fully ready state.

The 2X4 Lumber Test

The next series of tests was designed to evaluate the saws on material that nay fire department could readily have to cut through. Common 2x4 dimensional lumber was selected and placed in a workbench clamp. With the stopwatch running, inch-thick slices were cut off until the useful power of the battery diminished. A record was made of when each cut was completed as well as the total number of cuts and the total battery operating time. For all wood-cutting tests each saw used a Milwaukee AX10-tpi (tooth per inch) wood-cutting blade. A new blade was used for each test. During the DEWALT tests, the blade came loose in their old-style key chuck system twice and the handle design hurt the operator's gloved hand at the base of the thumb upon conclusion of the rugged tests. During the Milwaukee tests, saw vibration caused the batter to disconnect from the handle of the saw.

The Milwaukee reciprocating saw was able to cut 27 to 35 cuts with the battery cutting from four minutes, 52 seconds to a maximum of six minutes, five seconds. Under the conditions of the aggressive cutting test, the Milwaukee batteries lasted 37% as long as during their initial no-load test. Since the DEWALT saw ran nearly twice as long as the Milwaukee in the initial no-load test, I anticipated twice the performance cutting wood. That theory, however, did not hold true. The DEWALT saw with the original XR2 battery was able to complete from 16 to a maximum of 27 cuts through 2x4 lumber, operating for an average of five minutes, 40 seconds. This work output matched that of the Milwaukee saw. The DEWALT batteries powered the saw under load for approximately 25% of their no-load run time.

The A-Pillar Metal-Cutting Test

To simulate a typical vehicle rescue scenario, I developed an A-pillar test. In this evaluation, One firefighter used the same reciprocating saw to cut through the same from A-pillar of a car. As cuts were made, times were recorded at the completion of each cut. Each test stopped when the saw's cutting action stopped.

The Milwaukee reciprocating saw made 10 to 12 cuts through a typical A-pillar. The battery lasted from six minutes, 37 seconds to seven minutes, 43 seconds of operating time.

For the DEWALT A-pillar test, I used both the original XR2 battery and the upgraded XR+. With the XR2, the DEWALT saw typically operated for seven minutes and cut approximately 12 slices off an A-pillar. Fitted with the new-generation XR+ battery, in excess of 20 A-pillar cuts were completed with the saw running from eight minutes, 20 seconds to almost 12 ˝ minutes.

The Power Hawk 12-Volt Battery Test

Curtiss-Wright manufacturers the Power Hawk line of extrication equipment. Its system operates all its components off 12-volt DC electrical current. In a cooperative venture with Milwaukee, the Power Hawk product line now includes a kit to power a Milwaukee 18-volt reciprocating saw off the system's 12-volt power pack. This 12-volt battery is huge compared to the small 18-volt batteries used on the cordless saw and gives the saw a remarkable run time.

The adapter firs only the Milwaukee cordless reciprocating saw and retail for approximately $416. This includes the power cable and the 12-volt adapter that firs on the saw handle.

I conducted test to measure the work-output difference between a Milwaukee reciprocating saw with the Power Hawk 12 battery pack and once connected to only a single 18-volt battery, One firefighter with the Milwaukee saw and the Power Hawk battery pack cut through the B-pillar of an automobile seven to 10 times, simulating the average work capability of a single 18-volt battery. B-pillar cuts require more effort than A-pillar cuts because of the thicker materials that compromise the pillar. In addition in this test, one of the cuts not only went through the B-pillar, but also sliced through a Grade 8 backing plate of the seatbelt assembly. Milwaukee Torch blade were used.

Seven B-pillar cuts required five minutes, 20 seconds to complete. Upon completion, the Power Hawk battery pack indicated that 76% of its energy remained after all cuts were completed. At that rate, it is estimated that use of Power Hawk's 12-volt power unit lets the reciprocating saw operator cut for at least 22 minutes, four or more times the work possible with a single 18-volt battery.

The Nomad Battery Pack Test

A Fiskars' Nomad 7000 battery pack with three XR+ batteries powered the DEWALT saw for more than 18 minutes of constant cutting.

To answer objections of short run times for individual 18-volt batteries, the Fiskars Energy Systems Co. of Wausau, WI, introduced the Nomad 7000 Energy System. The Nomad until lets the user connect three DEWALT 18-volt batteries in a parallel circuit and store them in a portable backpack-style carry pouch. All three batteries are fitted with end caps inside the pouch, connecting them into one electrical circuit.

Extending from the pack is a thick coiled cord with an end piece that resembles a DEWALT battery. This attachment is the power conversion unit microprocessor, which converts the energy from the three batteries to sufficient voltage to power the reciprocating saw. Another feature of the new Nomad unit is that it comes with a built-in tickle charger. Connecting the Nomad to a 110-volt power source will let all three DEWALT batteries charge while inside the Nomad pouch. Because it is a trickle down charger, however, it takes 12 to 14 hours for all batteries to fully recharge.

Using DEWALT's original XR2 batteries in the Nomad battery pack, saw operators were able to complete the following evolutions:

  • Seven A-pillar cuts
  • Two B-pillar cuts
  • Five C-pillar cuts
  • Seven Nader pin cuts
  • Four hinge leaf cuts
  • One brake pedal shaft cut
  • Four steering wheel ring cuts
  • One steering column cut.

This test exhausted several saw operators and consumed six DEWALT nine-inch/14-tpi blades. In two other tests, the Nomad powered the saw through 12 minutes, 13 seconds of actual cutting time and 12 minutes, 43 seconds of aggressive cutting. The last test wore out three Torch blades and let me complete the following:

  • Eight A-pillar cuts
  • Four B-pillar cuts
  • Four Nader pin cuts
  • Four hinge leaf cuts
  • Two steering wheel ring cuts.

When the Nomad pack was equipped with fully charged DEWALT XR+ batteries, cutting time increased to a remarkable 18 minutes, 36 seconds.

18-Volt Battery Endurance Tests*
Milwaukee DEWALT XR2 DEWALT XR+
No-Load 13:24 23:00 30:04
Aged 60 Days 8:00
2x4 Lumber 4:52 - 6:05 5:39 - 6:23
A-Pillar 6:37 - 7:43 6:58 - 7:05 8:20 - 12:30
12v Hawk 21:40 (estimated)
Nomad 7000 12:15 - 12:43 18:36
*Time expressed in minutes and seconds

Do you want to see this artical in its orginial, printed format?

Cordless Reciprocating Saws, Part 4

get acrobat readerNote: Acrobat plug-in is required for viewing. To get the FREE Adobe Acrobat plug-in click here.


To send this article to a friend, just enter the email address below.

Your email:
Friend's email:
Message:

Send article button
Or, you can also print this page.

Click the button below to bring up a new "printer-friendly version" window to print this page.

Print this page
Back button
Recent Articles
DEWALT's Battery & Charger Systems Compatibility Chart
Power Tools: What Does Torque Rating Really Mean?
CUTTING THE CORD: High Voltage Lithium-Ion Powered Tools Help Corded Users Unplug and Increase Productivity

Related Articles
Part 1, Cordless Reciprocating Saws
Part 2, Cordless Reciprocating Saws
Part 3, Cordless Reciprocating Saws

Preference Poll
How often do you visit web sites about tools?

Less than once a week
Once a week
More than once a week
 

Privacy/Security | DEWALT Legal | Safe Travel with Cordless Tools
Global | Webmaster | Company Information
COPYRIGHT© 2009 DEWALT. All Rights Reserved. The following are trademarks for one or more DEWALT Power Tools and Accessories: The yellow and black color scheme; the "D"-shaped air intake grill; the array of pyramids on the handgrip; the kit box configuration; and the array of lozenge-shaped humps on the surface of the tool.